OK, we all know that Dog Show Judges talk. They talk about us, about our dogs, they gossip, and if they don't spread it, they certainly hear it. After all, for the most part, they are people too.
Someone asked me a question last night about a Judge's facebook page. I am not that up on facebook, every now and then I put something on Dave's page, but that is as far as it goes. As I understand it, one person (we'll call them person 'H') can post something on another person's (person 'J') then person 'J' can remove it, leave it alone, or comment on it. So, let us 'assume' (I know, I know) that Person H posted a show photo on Person J's facebook page. Person J highly awarded Person H in this photo. That should be enough said, BUT, is it really appropriate for Person J to make a comment on the photo to the effect that the dog in the photo was the only thing that made judging that day worthwhile?
Things that make you go "Hmmmm..."
Someone asked me a question last night about a Judge's facebook page. I am not that up on facebook, every now and then I put something on Dave's page, but that is as far as it goes. As I understand it, one person (we'll call them person 'H') can post something on another person's (person 'J') then person 'J' can remove it, leave it alone, or comment on it. So, let us 'assume' (I know, I know) that Person H posted a show photo on Person J's facebook page. Person J highly awarded Person H in this photo. That should be enough said, BUT, is it really appropriate for Person J to make a comment on the photo to the effect that the dog in the photo was the only thing that made judging that day worthwhile?
Things that make you go "Hmmmm..."
